Following the adoption of a law allowing marriage between same sex and of the rights derived from this institution, a "controversy" has been taken and more than one voice was raised to say: the right of adoption of homosexual couples.
Some have opined that the single junction and is an aberration, so that raising a child in "the environment" is inconceivable.
First, under what standards we consider the existence of an aberration?
transcribe one of the definitions that the English Language Dictionary gives this concept: act or conduct depraved, perverse, or that deviate from what is accepted as legal.
In this vein, the acceptance would be the key factor. And in many cases, the acceptance does not occur when ignorance prevails in the trial of the collective.
It has happened in the realm of what should be a family: that if single mothers, that if divorced, if they are leaning against or any other form that does not follow the guideline mother-father-child preceded the institution of marriage.
I personally believe that sexual preference is not conclusive on the proper upbringing of a child. Moreover, how many times have we heard about heterosexual couples who have abused their children? Either physically, emotionally or sexually. Is not that an aberration?
However, the adoption process is not simple because measures are taken to insure proper development for the adoptee.
On the other hand, this takes some edges. Especially in a society so fixed as ours.
imagine the cruelty of children: "Your parents are queers" "Your moms are tortillas
And that's not an aberration. Insecurity and ignorance make discrimination in some self-acceptance.
The issue of alternative families should be taken objectively, as it is, an alternative to a society that prides itself on obsolete values \u200b\u200bthat promote divisiveness and do not contribute to solving real problems.
0 comments:
Post a Comment